PRICE
+14.15%
$4.04
PRICE
+9.06%
$0.1812
PRICE
+7.44%
$0.01106
PRICE
+5.85%
$1.38
PRICE
+5.82%
$367.87
PRICE
+4.52%
$0.6435
PRICE
+4.18%
$0.03696
PRICE
+3.32%
$0.09334
PRICE
+3.15%
$92.25
PRICE
+3%
$326.94
PRICE
+2.97%
$1.39
PRICE
+2.72%
$0.2587
PRICE
+2.67%
$0.09096
PRICE
+2.66%
$1.29
PRICE
+2.55%
$9.42
PRICE
+2.54%
$0.001849
PRICE
+2.38%
$1.82
PRICE
+2.33%
$0.02712
PRICE
+2.22%
$0.07938
PRICE
+2.21%
$247.56
PRICE
+2.13%
$633.93
PRICE
+2.08%
$9.43
PRICE
+2.06%
$76,474.33
PRICE
+2%
$0.2133
PRICE
+1.99%
$0.03510
VOL24
+2,649.87%
$1.03
VOL24
+1,232.48%
$0.9971
VOL24
+998.52%
$1.0000
VOL24
+852.54%
$1.01
VOL24
+268.15%
$1.0000
VOL24
+221.21%
$10.38
VOL24
+210.09%
$0.1495
VOL24
+183.22%
$1.9
VOL24
+139.65%
$2,313.39
VOL24
+118.69%
$0.1687
VOL24
+62.53%
$2,849.93
VOL24
+59.3%
$0.03696
VOL24
+58.23%
$1.38
VOL24
+44.22%
$0.1812
VOL24
+36.52%
$1.01
VOL24
+35.29%
$4,753.32
VOL24
+30.54%
$83.72
VOL24
+28.45%
$0.001849
VOL24
+19.65%
$0.6999
VOL24
+17.72%
$0.09334
VOL24
+15.04%
$8.5
VOL24
+14.37%
$76,474.33
VOL24
+12.78%
$0.9996
VOL24
+11.1%
$1.0000
VOL24
+10.33%
$40.89
PRICE
+14.15%
$4.04
PRICE
+9.06%
$0.1812
PRICE
+7.44%
$0.01106
PRICE
+5.85%
$1.38
PRICE
+5.82%
$367.87
PRICE
+4.52%
$0.6435
PRICE
+4.18%
$0.03696
PRICE
+3.32%
$0.09334
PRICE
+3.15%
$92.25
PRICE
+3%
$326.94
PRICE
+2.97%
$1.39
PRICE
+2.72%
$0.2587
PRICE
+2.67%
$0.09096
PRICE
+2.66%
$1.29
PRICE
+2.55%
$9.42
PRICE
+2.54%
$0.001849
PRICE
+2.38%
$1.82
PRICE
+2.33%
$0.02712
PRICE
+2.22%
$0.07938
PRICE
+2.21%
$247.56
PRICE
+2.13%
$633.93
PRICE
+2.08%
$9.43
PRICE
+2.06%
$76,474.33
PRICE
+2%
$0.2133
PRICE
+1.99%
$0.03510
VOL24
+2,649.87%
$1.03
VOL24
+1,232.48%
$0.9971
VOL24
+998.52%
$1.0000
VOL24
+852.54%
$1.01
VOL24
+268.15%
$1.0000
VOL24
+221.21%
$10.38
VOL24
+210.09%
$0.1495
VOL24
+183.22%
$1.9
VOL24
+139.65%
$2,313.39
VOL24
+118.69%
$0.1687
VOL24
+62.53%
$2,849.93
VOL24
+59.3%
$0.03696
VOL24
+58.23%
$1.38
VOL24
+44.22%
$0.1812
VOL24
+36.52%
$1.01
VOL24
+35.29%
$4,753.32
VOL24
+30.54%
$83.72
VOL24
+28.45%
$0.001849
VOL24
+19.65%
$0.6999
VOL24
+17.72%
$0.09334
VOL24
+15.04%
$8.5
VOL24
+14.37%
$76,474.33
VOL24
+12.78%
$0.9996
VOL24
+11.1%
$1.0000
VOL24
+10.33%
$40.89
$446.31
#15
$9,409,176,438
$275,559,263
20,008,756.15
20,008,756.15
Rise 40%
Fall 60%
Bitcoin Cash is a hard fork of Bitcoin with a protocol upgrade to fix on-chain capacity. Bitcoin Cash intends to be a Bitcoin without Segregated Witness (SegWit) as soft fork, where upgrades of the protocol are done mainly through hard forks and without changing the original economic rules of the Bitcoin. Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is released on 1st August 2017 as an upgraded version of the original Bitcoin Core software. The main upgrade is the increase in the block size limit from 1MB to 8MB. This effectively allows miners on the BCH chain to process up to 8 times more payments per second in comparison to Bitcoin. This makes for faster, cheaper transactions and a much smoother user experience. Why was Bitcoin Cash Created? The main objective of Bitcoin Cash is to to bring back the essential qualities of money inherent in the original Bitcoin software. Over the years, these qualities were filtered out of Bitcoin Core and progress was stifled by various people, organizations, and companies involved in Bitcoin protocol development. The result is that Bitcoin Core is currently unusable as money due to increasingly high fees per transactions and transfer times taking hours to complete. This is all because of the 1MB limitation of Bitcoin Core’s block size, causing it unable to accommodate to large number of transactions. Essentially Bitcoin Cash is a community-activated upgrade (otherwise known as a hard fork) of Bitcoin that increased the block size to 8MB, solving the scaling issues that plague Bitcoin Core today. Nov 16th 2018: A hashwar resulted in a split between Bitcoin SV and Bitcoin ABC
Rank #10
$0.09541
+1.67%
Rank #18
$353.79
+0.31%
Rank #22
$316.54
+1.79%
Rank #24
$55.03
+1.03%
Rank #109
$18.51
-1.5%
Rank #113
$34.36
+0.74%
Rank #137
$15.97
+3.09%
Rank #252
$6.24
+5.99%
Rank #304
$0.006148
+5.7%
Rank #353
$0.004168
+1.88%
Rank #1205
$0.5203
+0.03%
Rank #2219
$0.01142
+236.55%
17 Apr 2026, 17:37
Bitcoin pole vaulted to $78,000 and altcoins soared after Iran said that the Strait of Hormuz was fully open. Will bulls be able to sustain the upward momentum?
17 Apr 2026, 03:00
Japan’s biggest loyalty program may have just become one of crypto’s most unexpected entry points. Related Reading: Bitcoin Could Hit $85K Before April Ends, Analyst Says A Rewards System Worth $23 Billion Opens Up Rakuten is sitting on more than 3 trillion loyalty points — valued at roughly $23 billion — and users can now convert those points into XRP. That single detail changes the nature of this integration. It is not just another tech company adding a crypto option. It is an existing, widely used rewards system being turned into a direct path into digital currency, no exchange account required. Reports confirmed the points-to-XRP conversion feature is part of the rollout inside the Rakuten Pay app and Rakuten Wallet. The announcement pushed XRP to $1.38, with the token’s market cap climbing above $84 billion. Trading volume came in at $2.4 billion over the past 24 hours, though that figure was down 25% from the prior period. 🚨IT’S OFFICIAL: XRP is LIVE for 44 million users on one of the largest wallets in Japan, Rakuten Wallet. Enabling users purchasing anything by using #XRP! pic.twitter.com/pOd9CNXpTe — JackTheRippler ©️ (@RippleXrpie) April 15, 2026 44 Million Users, 5 Million Merchant Locations The scale of Rakuten’s network is what makes this stand out. Around 44 million users will be able to hold XRP in the Rakuten Wallet, buy it with loyalty points, and fund Rakuten Cash to spend in physical stores and online. That covers more than 5 million merchant locations across Japan. Users can also spot trade XRP directly inside the app. Rakuten had already added Bitcoin, Ether, and Bitcoin Cash in earlier phases. XRP now joins that group inside one of Japan’s largest consumer platforms — one that most of its users visit for shopping, not for investing. Ripple’s senior ecosystem growth manager Tatsuya Kohrogi called this one of the most significant milestones for XRP, pointing out that Rakuten Pay is a mainstream commerce app, not a product built for crypto users. That means XRP is being placed in front of tens of millions of people who may have never bought or held digital currency before. Related Reading: ‘Extremely Good News’ – XRP DeFi Momentum Builds As SEC Softens Position On Interfaces Whether Everyday Shoppers Follow Matters Most XRP has long been associated with institutional cross-border payments. A move into retail point-of-sale spending in Japan marks a clear shift in how the token is showing up in real-world use. Based on reports, analysts see the potential as real but conditional. The bigger question is not whether Rakuten has the infrastructure — it clearly does. The question is whether ordinary shoppers choose XRP when it is time to pay, or stick to yen and existing payment methods they already trust. If even a fraction of that $23 billion in loyalty points finds its way into XRP and circulates through everyday commerce, it could push other large consumer platforms to take a closer look at similar moves. Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
16 Apr 2026, 16:55
BitcoinWorld Bitcoin BIP-361 Warning: Hoskinson’s Alarming Claim of 1.7M BTC Freeze Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has issued a stark warning about a proposed Bitcoin upgrade, claiming it could permanently lock away approximately 1.7 million BTC. His analysis, centered on Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 361 (BIP-361), challenges the cryptocurrency community’s understanding of a critical quantum computing defense mechanism. This development, reported by CoinDesk, raises fundamental questions about Bitcoin’s future security and the integrity of its earliest assets. Bitcoin BIP-361 Proposal and the Quantum Threat BIP-361 represents a technical response to a looming technological challenge: quantum computing. Experts widely acknowledge that future quantum computers could break the cryptographic algorithms securing Bitcoin wallets. Consequently, developers have proposed BIP-361 as a preemptive defense. The proposal aims to migrate vulnerable coins to a new, quantum-resistant security system before any attack occurs. However, the implementation method has become a major point of contention within the developer community. Traditionally, Bitcoin upgrades occur through two primary mechanisms: Soft Fork: A backward-compatible upgrade where new rules are introduced, but old nodes still recognize new blocks as valid. Hard Fork: A permanent divergence in the blockchain, creating two separate networks if all nodes do not adopt the new rules. Proponents of BIP-361 have classified it as a soft fork, suggesting a smoother, more consensus-driven upgrade path. Conversely, Hoskinson vehemently disputes this classification, arguing the technical reality dictates a hard fork outcome. Hoskinson’s Core Argument: A Mislabeled Hard Fork Charles Hoskinson’s central critique focuses on the technical execution of BIP-361 and its impact on early Bitcoin. He asserts that the proposal’s mechanics would not allow for backward compatibility. Specifically, the upgrade would require moving coins from old, vulnerable addresses to new, secure ones. For coins mined after 2013, this process is theoretically straightforward because owners can prove ownership with modern seed phrases or private keys. The critical problem, according to Hoskinson, lies with the approximately 1.7 million BTC mined before 2013. During Bitcoin’s earliest years, the ecosystem lacked standardized wallet practices. Many early miners, including the enigmatic creator Satoshi Nakamoto, likely stored keys in rudimentary ways. Some may have used simple text files, paper wallets, or early software clients that did not generate modern seed phrases. Therefore, proving ownership to migrate these coins under BIP-361’s rules could be impossible. The Satoshi Nakamoto Conundrum This issue directly impacts the roughly 1 million BTC attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto. These coins have remained untouched since their creation, symbolizing the founder’s belief in the project. Hoskinson’s warning suggests BIP-361 would effectively freeze this legendary cache forever. Furthermore, it would lock hundreds of thousands of other early-mined coins whose owners may have lost access or lack the specific proof required by the new protocol. This scenario creates a significant ethical and economic dilemma for the Bitcoin network. Technical and Community Implications The debate extends beyond a simple technical disagreement. It touches on core Bitcoin principles like decentralization, immutability, and network consensus. Labeling BIP-361 as a soft fork could influence how miners and node operators vote on its adoption. Many participants might support a soft fork under the assumption of minimal disruption. However, if Hoskinson’s analysis is correct, the result would be a contentious hard fork with substantial unintended consequences. Industry observers note this is not the first time upgrade classification has caused controversy. The 2017 Segregated Witness (SegWit) activation involved a complex soft-fork mechanism. Similarly, the Bitcoin Cash split resulted from a fundamental disagreement on block size, leading to a definitive hard fork. The table below compares key aspects of these historical events with the current BIP-361 debate. Event Type Key Issue Outcome SegWit (2017) Soft Fork Transaction Malleability & Scaling Successfully Activated Bitcoin Cash (2017) Hard Fork Block Size Increase Permanent Chain Split BIP-361 (Proposed) Disputed (Soft vs. Hard) Quantum Defense & Legacy Coin Migration Pending Community Decision This historical context shows that protocol changes can have lasting network effects. The potential freezing of 1.7 million BTC would represent a permanent reduction in Bitcoin’s circulating and liquid supply. Market analysts suggest such an event could have profound implications for Bitcoin’s scarcity narrative and long-term valuation models. Expert Perspectives and the Path Forward The cryptocurrency community has reacted with a mix of concern and skepticism. Some developers agree that the migration of pre-2013 coins presents a unique challenge. Others argue that Hoskinson’s assessment may overstate the risks or that technical solutions could emerge. The broader consensus emphasizes that any quantum defense must be thoroughly vetted. Furthermore, it must maintain the network’s foundational integrity. Quantum computing researchers estimate that a machine capable of breaking Bitcoin’s ECDSA cryptography is likely a decade or more away. This timeline provides the development community with crucial breathing room. It allows for extensive testing, alternative proposal development, and broader stakeholder consultation. The ultimate decision will require balancing urgent security needs with the preservation of Bitcoin’s entire historical ledger. Conclusion Charles Hoskinson’s warning about the Bitcoin BIP-361 proposal highlights a critical juncture for the world’s leading cryptocurrency. The potential to freeze 1.7 million BTC, including the coins held by Satoshi Nakamoto, underscores the high stakes of protocol evolution. As the community grapples with the quantum computing threat, the debate between soft and hard fork implementations will intensify. The final outcome will test Bitcoin’s governance, its resilience, and its commitment to preserving every satoshi ever created. The path forward demands rigorous technical scrutiny and transparent dialogue to ensure the network’s security does not come at the cost of its soul. FAQs Q1: What is BIP-361? BIP-361 is a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal designed to defend the network against future attacks from quantum computers by migrating coins to a quantum-resistant cryptographic system. Q2: Why does Charles Hoskinson say it could freeze 1.7 million BTC? Hoskinson argues that coins mined before 2013, including Satoshi Nakamoto’s, may lack the modern proof-of-ownership (like seed phrases) required to migrate under BIP-361’s rules, making them permanently inaccessible. Q3: What is the difference between a soft fork and a hard fork? A soft fork is a backward-compatible upgrade, while a hard fork creates a permanent split in the blockchain, resulting in two separate networks if consensus is not universal. Q4: How imminent is the quantum computing threat to Bitcoin? Most experts believe a quantum computer powerful enough to break Bitcoin’s encryption is at least 10-15 years away, providing time for careful solution development. Q5: What happens to Bitcoin if Satoshi’s coins are permanently frozen? Freezing Satoshi’s 1 million BTC would permanently remove them from the potential circulating supply, potentially increasing scarcity but also raising philosophical questions about preserving the original blockchain’s state. This post Bitcoin BIP-361 Warning: Hoskinson’s Alarming Claim of 1.7M BTC Freeze first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
15 Apr 2026, 18:51
A Bitcoin daily candlestick close above $76,000 would complete a bullish trend reversal and shift the bulls’ short-term price target to $84,000. Will altcoins follow the rally?
Invest ideas
