Coin info
Rank
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Circulating Supply
Total Supply
Do you think the price will rise or fall?
Rise 40%
Fall 60%
Price perfomance
Depth of Market
Depth +2%
Depth -2%


PRICE
+23.28%
$0.001996

PRICE
+13.26%
$0.09747

PRICE
+4.88%
$0.053

PRICE
+2.42%
$0.005338

PRICE
+2.33%
$0.1275

PRICE
+1.93%
$0.2001

PRICE
+1.57%
$8.44
PRICE
+1.47%
$0.02817

PRICE
+1.43%
$0.7493

PRICE
+1.29%
$76.67
PRICE
+1.29%
$0.02838

PRICE
+1.23%
$0.3454

PRICE
+1.22%
$0.006179

PRICE
+1.1%
$0.4253

PRICE
+0.92%
$0.054

PRICE
+0.86%
$196.57

PRICE
+0.83%
$67.11

PRICE
+0.76%
$47.11

PRICE
+0.69%
$0.09012

PRICE
+0.65%
$2,320.61

PRICE
+0.62%
$1.1

PRICE
+0.53%
$1,873.56

PRICE
+0.47%
$1,876.35

PRICE
+0.45%
$0.06126

PRICE
+0.42%
$0.1869

VOL24
+551.22%
$0.9998

VOL24
+499.88%
$1.13

VOL24
+491.27%
$0.001996

VOL24
+275.08%
$0.09747

VOL24
+232.36%
$0.9952

VOL24
+147.82%
$1.0000

VOL24
+142.99%
$1.14

VOL24
+133.85%
$0.053

VOL24
+90.66%
$4,019.56

VOL24
+84.22%
$0.052

VOL24
+73.78%
$0.6198

VOL24
+62.15%
$6.61

VOL24
+61.39%
$0.7242

VOL24
+56.82%
$1.22

VOL24
+47.37%
$0.1869

VOL24
+46.39%
$76.67

VOL24
+44.12%
$196.57

VOL24
+43.97%
$1,876.35

VOL24
+43.29%
$56.47

VOL24
+42.18%
$0.9985

VOL24
+40.88%
$4,044.83

VOL24
+39%
$0.8219

VOL24
+36.65%
$0.9999

VOL24
+31.75%
$6.95

VOL24
+30.63%
$0.7517

PRICE
+23.28%
$0.001996

PRICE
+13.26%
$0.09747

PRICE
+4.88%
$0.053

PRICE
+2.42%
$0.005338

PRICE
+2.33%
$0.1275

PRICE
+1.93%
$0.2001

PRICE
+1.57%
$8.44
PRICE
+1.47%
$0.02817

PRICE
+1.43%
$0.7493

PRICE
+1.29%
$76.67
PRICE
+1.29%
$0.02838

PRICE
+1.23%
$0.3454

PRICE
+1.22%
$0.006179

PRICE
+1.1%
$0.4253

PRICE
+0.92%
$0.054

PRICE
+0.86%
$196.57

PRICE
+0.83%
$67.11

PRICE
+0.76%
$47.11

PRICE
+0.69%
$0.09012

PRICE
+0.65%
$2,320.61

PRICE
+0.62%
$1.1

PRICE
+0.53%
$1,873.56

PRICE
+0.47%
$1,876.35

PRICE
+0.45%
$0.06126

PRICE
+0.42%
$0.1869

VOL24
+551.22%
$0.9998

VOL24
+499.88%
$1.13

VOL24
+491.27%
$0.001996

VOL24
+275.08%
$0.09747

VOL24
+232.36%
$0.9952

VOL24
+147.82%
$1.0000

VOL24
+142.99%
$1.14

VOL24
+133.85%
$0.053

VOL24
+90.66%
$4,019.56

VOL24
+84.22%
$0.052

VOL24
+73.78%
$0.6198

VOL24
+62.15%
$6.61

VOL24
+61.39%
$0.7242

VOL24
+56.82%
$1.22

VOL24
+47.37%
$0.1869

VOL24
+46.39%
$76.67

VOL24
+44.12%
$196.57

VOL24
+43.97%
$1,876.35

VOL24
+43.29%
$56.47

VOL24
+42.18%
$0.9985

VOL24
+40.88%
$4,044.83

VOL24
+39%
$0.8219

VOL24
+36.65%
$0.9999

VOL24
+31.75%
$6.95

VOL24
+30.63%
$0.7517
Rise 40%
Fall 60%


$17.39
#198
$185,848,445
$27,560,263
9,668,189.28
10,000,000

Rank #41
$3.55
-1.11%

Rank #47
$89.33
-2.22%

Rank #120
$0.2133
-1.32%

Rank #261
$0.2528
-5.06%

Rank #289
$2,156.93
-0.06%

Rank #422
$0.1644
-0.13%

Rank #611
$0.2726
-0.93%

Rank #1078
$1.93
-0.15%

Rank #1221
$0.2624
-61.8%

Rank #2189
$0.1205
-3.86%

Rank #30942
$1,419.91
+10.75%
The Compound Governance Token is a governance token on the Compound Finance lending protocol, COMP allows the owner to delegate voting rights to the address of their choice; the owner’s wallet, another user, an application, or a DeFi expert. Anybody can participate in Compound governance by receiving delegation, without needing to own COMP. Anybody with 1% of COMP delegated to their address can propose a governance action; these are simple or complex sets of actions, such as adding support for a new asset, changing an asset’s collateral factor, changing a market’s interest rate model, or changing any other parameter or variable of the protocol that the current administrator can modify.
28 May 2026, 01:10

BitcoinWorld Trend Research Sells UNI and COMP at Estimated $40.3 Million Loss, On-Chain Data Shows A cryptocurrency address linked to the research firm Trend Research has liquidated its holdings of Uniswap (UNI) and Compound (COMP) tokens, incurring an estimated total loss of approximately $40.29 million, according to on-chain data shared by blockchain analyst EmberCN. Details of the Trade and Loss Calculation Blockchain tracking data reveals that the address deposited 2,705,000 UNI tokens, valued at roughly $8.71 million at the time of the transfer, alongside 114,000 COMP tokens, worth approximately $2.13 million, to the Binance exchange. EmberCN calculated the realized loss based on the address’s historical average purchase price of $9.50 per UNI token and $49.30 per COMP token. At the time of the report, market data from CoinMarketCap showed UNI trading at $3.09 and COMP at $18.14, representing significant declines from their purchase prices. Market Context and Implications The sale comes during a prolonged period of depressed prices for many DeFi (decentralized finance) tokens, including UNI and COMP, which have fallen substantially from their all-time highs. The decision by a research-focused entity to exit these positions at a steep loss may signal a shift in sentiment or a strategic reallocation of capital. For market observers, such large-scale moves by known addresses can influence short-term price action and provide insight into the behavior of institutional or professional traders. What This Means for Retail Investors While the loss is substantial, it is important for retail investors to understand that such trades are part of the high-risk, high-volatility nature of cryptocurrency markets. The sale does not necessarily indicate a fundamental flaw in the Uniswap or Compound protocols themselves, but rather reflects the market’s current pricing and the specific cost basis of this particular investor. Events like these serve as a reminder of the importance of risk management and the potential for significant losses even among professional research firms. Conclusion The on-chain record of Trend Research’s sale of UNI and COMP at a combined loss of over $40 million provides a clear, verifiable example of the financial risks inherent in cryptocurrency trading. As blockchain analytics continue to offer transparency into market movements, such data points become valuable for understanding broader market sentiment and the behavior of key participants. FAQs Q1: Who is Trend Research? A1: Trend Research is a cryptocurrency research and analysis firm. The specific address used in this transaction has been linked to the firm by blockchain analysts, though the firm has not publicly commented on the trade. Q2: How was the loss calculated? A2: The loss was calculated by blockchain analyst EmberCN using the average purchase price of the tokens (UNI at $9.50, COMP at $49.30) compared to the market price at the time of the deposit to Binance (UNI at $3.09, COMP at $18.14). The total loss is estimated at $40.29 million. Q3: Does this sale affect the value of UNI or COMP? A3: Large sales can create short-term selling pressure, but the long-term value of UNI and COMP depends on the fundamentals of their respective protocols, market demand, and broader crypto market conditions. This single trade is not necessarily indicative of a trend. This post Trend Research Sells UNI and COMP at Estimated $40.3 Million Loss, On-Chain Data Shows first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
27 May 2026, 06:30

BitcoinWorld OpenZeppelin Co-Founder Issues Stark Warning: Withdraw Funds From All DeFi Protocols, Including Aave and Compound In a stark and unprecedented warning that has sent ripples through the cryptocurrency industry, Manuel Aráoz, co-founder of the prominent blockchain security firm OpenZeppelin, has publicly advised users to withdraw their funds from all decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols. According to a report by The Block, Aráoz took to social media platform X to express his view that no DeFi protocol, including blue-chip platforms like Aave (AAVE) and Compound (COMP), can currently be considered safe from exploitation. The Core of the Warning: AI vs. Human Security Aráoz’s central argument hinges on a fundamental shift in the cybersecurity landscape. He contends that the emergence of advanced artificial intelligence agents has tilted the playing field decisively in favor of attackers. While a security team must identify and patch a vast number of potential vulnerabilities across complex smart contract codebases, an attacker—now augmented by AI—only needs to find a single, unpatched flaw to drain an entire protocol’s liquidity. This asymmetry, Aráoz argues, creates an untenable risk for users. The speed and scale at which AI can now analyze code, discover zero-day exploits, and execute attacks have surpassed the capabilities of human-led defense teams. This is not a theoretical concern; the DeFi sector has already suffered billions of dollars in losses from hacks and exploits over the past several years, with attack vectors becoming increasingly sophisticated. Implications for the DeFi Ecosystem This warning comes from a figure with significant authority in the crypto security space. OpenZeppelin is the team behind the widely used OpenZeppelin Contracts library, a foundational building block for countless Ethereum-based smart contracts. Aráoz’s statement carries weight because it represents a deep insider’s loss of confidence in the security model that underpins the entire DeFi sector. His recommendation to withdraw funds from even the most established protocols—those that have undergone extensive audits and have long track records—suggests a belief that the current security paradigm is fundamentally broken. For everyday users, this creates a difficult dilemma: the promise of DeFi is self-custody and yield generation, but the reality may now involve an unacceptable level of systemic risk that no amount of due diligence can fully mitigate. Why This Matters to Crypto Users For readers who hold assets in DeFi protocols, this is not just another market rumor. It is a direct warning from a leading security expert that the tools used to protect their funds may no longer be adequate against AI-powered adversaries. The immediate takeaway is a call for heightened caution. While Aráoz’s advice is absolute—withdraw from all protocols—a more measured approach might involve reassessing one’s risk tolerance, diversifying across different security models, or moving assets to more traditional custody solutions until the industry can develop new, AI-resistant security frameworks. The development also puts pressure on DeFi developers and auditors to innovate rapidly. The industry may need to move beyond traditional smart contract audits and embrace real-time monitoring, formal verification, and AI-powered defensive tools just to keep pace with the threat. Conclusion Manuel Aráoz’s warning represents a significant moment for the DeFi industry, highlighting a potential existential threat from the very technology that many in the sector champion. While the immediate impact may be a short-term pullback in TVL (Total Value Locked) as users reassess their positions, the long-term challenge is clear: the security of decentralized finance must evolve dramatically to counter the new reality of AI-driven attacks. Until then, users are advised to proceed with extreme caution and to consider the source of this warning carefully. FAQs Q1: Did Manuel Aráoz really say to withdraw from ALL DeFi protocols? Yes. According to a report by The Block, Aráoz recommended on X that users withdraw their funds from all DeFi protocols, including well-known platforms like Aave and Compound, because he believes the security advantage now lies with attackers using AI. Q2: Why does AI give attackers such a big advantage in DeFi? Aráoz argues that AI agents can now find vulnerabilities in smart contracts faster and more comprehensively than human defenders. A defender must fix every potential bug, while an attacker only needs to find one critical flaw to drain all funds. Q3: Is this warning credible? Aráoz is a co-founder of OpenZeppelin, the company behind the most widely used smart contract security library in the Ethereum ecosystem. His expertise and insider perspective give this warning significant credibility within the industry. This post OpenZeppelin Co-Founder Issues Stark Warning: Withdraw Funds From All DeFi Protocols, Including Aave and Compound first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
25 May 2026, 08:15

BitcoinWorld IOSG Ventures-Linked Wallet Deposits $11.5M in UNI and COMP to Binance, Signaling Potential Sell-Off A wallet linked to the research-focused Web3 investment firm IOSG Ventures has moved a significant amount of crypto assets to the Binance exchange, a move typically interpreted as a precursor to selling. According to data from blockchain analytics platform Onchain Lens, the address deposited 9.23 million dollars worth of Uniswap (UNI) and 2.30 million dollars worth of Compound (COMP) to Binance. Details of the Transaction The transaction, which took place recently, involved the transfer of 2.7 million UNI tokens and 114,352 COMP tokens. This deposit comes approximately 10 months after the same address withdrew 5.41 million UNI (worth roughly $51.53 million at the time) and 228,704 COMP (worth about $11.29 million) from the same exchange. Following the latest deposit, the address still holds a remaining balance of 2.7 million UNI and 114,352 COMP. Implications and Potential Losses Deposits to centralized exchanges are widely regarded in the crypto community as an indication of an intent to sell. If the assets were sold immediately upon deposit, the address would have realized a substantial loss of approximately $39.76 million compared to the value at the time of withdrawal. This significant potential loss highlights the volatile nature of the cryptocurrency market and the risks associated with holding large positions over time. Context and Market Significance IOSG Ventures is known for its deep involvement in the Web3 and decentralized finance (DeFi) sectors. A move of this magnitude by a wallet associated with such a prominent firm can influence market sentiment. While the specific reasons for the deposit are not publicly known, the transaction provides a real-time data point for on-chain analysts and traders monitoring whale activity. The remaining holdings in the wallet also represent a sizable position that could affect market liquidity if moved in the future. Conclusion The deposit of $11.5 million in UNI and COMP to Binance by an IOSG Ventures-linked wallet is a notable on-chain event. It serves as a reminder of the transparency of blockchain transactions and the potential market impact of large holders, or ‘whales,’ moving assets. The implied loss of nearly $40 million underscores the high-stakes environment of crypto investing, even for sophisticated, research-driven firms. FAQs Q1: What does it mean when a wallet deposits tokens to an exchange? Depositing tokens to a centralized exchange like Binance is often interpreted as a sign that the holder intends to sell the assets, as exchanges provide the liquidity for trading. However, it could also be for other purposes like staking or moving funds to a different wallet. Q2: Who is IOSG Ventures? IOSG Ventures is a research-driven investment firm focused on the Web3 and decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. They are known for their in-depth analysis and early-stage investments in blockchain projects. Q3: How reliable is on-chain analysis data? On-chain analysis is generally considered reliable as it is based on public blockchain data. However, linking a specific wallet to a real-world entity like IOSG Ventures involves a degree of inference. The data from platforms like Onchain Lens is verifiable on the blockchain, but the attribution to a specific firm is based on patterns and publicly available information. This post IOSG Ventures-Linked Wallet Deposits $11.5M in UNI and COMP to Binance, Signaling Potential Sell-Off first appeared on BitcoinWorld .