Coin info
Rank
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Circulating Supply
Total Supply
Do you think the price will rise or fall?
Rise 40%
Fall 60%
Price perfomance
Depth of Market
Depth +2%
Depth -2%


PRICE
+17.24%
$0.2483
PRICE
+9.06%
$0.03465

PRICE
+8.42%
$399.54

PRICE
+6.96%
$0.1259

PRICE
+5.4%
$0.4862
PRICE
+5.16%
$672.82

PRICE
+5.16%
$66.16

PRICE
+5.11%
$0.2526

PRICE
+4.92%
$2.01

PRICE
+4.15%
$0.09628

PRICE
+4.14%
$0.03682

PRICE
+4%
$0.1846

PRICE
+3.46%
$0.008012

PRICE
+3.4%
$0.006360

PRICE
+3.07%
$0.09105

PRICE
+2.9%
$0.6905

PRICE
+2.75%
$0.9874

PRICE
+2.32%
$0.001748

PRICE
+2%
$0.8401

PRICE
+1.75%
$0.07937

PRICE
+1.41%
$1.34

PRICE
+1.35%
$0.055

PRICE
+1.3%
$0.1008

PRICE
+1.3%
$0.9399

PRICE
+1.23%
$52.44

VOL24
+3,336.94%
$1.14
VOL24
+360.2%
$0.01052

VOL24
+98.59%
$0.006363

VOL24
+96.79%
$1.13

VOL24
+75.23%
$399.59

VOL24
+67.86%
$0.9986

VOL24
+62.08%
$0.1260
VOL24
+61.59%
$673.16

VOL24
+51.41%
$0.09628

VOL24
+46.23%
$0.008005

VOL24
+43.8%
$2.01

VOL24
+41.51%
$0.2527

VOL24
+41.05%
$1.98

VOL24
+40.49%
$0.6905

VOL24
+40.46%
$0.9985

VOL24
+40.1%
$0.9992

VOL24
+38.35%
$0.9998

VOL24
+37.04%
$0.1543

VOL24
+32.55%
$0.4862

VOL24
+31.41%
$66.14

VOL24
+30.97%
$9.12

VOL24
+27.23%
$0.3450

VOL24
+26.87%
$0.2482

VOL24
+25.69%
$0.05911

VOL24
+25.32%
$0.2343

PRICE
+17.24%
$0.2483
PRICE
+9.06%
$0.03465

PRICE
+8.42%
$399.54

PRICE
+6.96%
$0.1259

PRICE
+5.4%
$0.4862
PRICE
+5.16%
$672.82

PRICE
+5.16%
$66.16

PRICE
+5.11%
$0.2526

PRICE
+4.92%
$2.01

PRICE
+4.15%
$0.09628

PRICE
+4.14%
$0.03682

PRICE
+4%
$0.1846

PRICE
+3.46%
$0.008012

PRICE
+3.4%
$0.006360

PRICE
+3.07%
$0.09105

PRICE
+2.9%
$0.6905

PRICE
+2.75%
$0.9874

PRICE
+2.32%
$0.001748

PRICE
+2%
$0.8401

PRICE
+1.75%
$0.07937

PRICE
+1.41%
$1.34

PRICE
+1.35%
$0.055

PRICE
+1.3%
$0.1008

PRICE
+1.3%
$0.9399

PRICE
+1.23%
$52.44

VOL24
+3,336.94%
$1.14
VOL24
+360.2%
$0.01052

VOL24
+98.59%
$0.006363

VOL24
+96.79%
$1.13

VOL24
+75.23%
$399.59

VOL24
+67.86%
$0.9986

VOL24
+62.08%
$0.1260
VOL24
+61.59%
$673.16

VOL24
+51.41%
$0.09628

VOL24
+46.23%
$0.008005

VOL24
+43.8%
$2.01

VOL24
+41.51%
$0.2527

VOL24
+41.05%
$1.98

VOL24
+40.49%
$0.6905

VOL24
+40.46%
$0.9985

VOL24
+40.1%
$0.9992

VOL24
+38.35%
$0.9998

VOL24
+37.04%
$0.1543

VOL24
+32.55%
$0.4862

VOL24
+31.41%
$66.14

VOL24
+30.97%
$9.12

VOL24
+27.23%
$0.3450

VOL24
+26.87%
$0.2482

VOL24
+25.69%
$0.05911

VOL24
+25.32%
$0.2343
Rise 40%
Fall 60%


$0.05942
#506
$44,483,192
$39,913,464
709,984,438.92
1,186,707,049

Rank #698
$0.006138
-1.53%

Rank #1220
$0.1611
+6.94%
![Phoenix Global [OLD]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoin-images.coingecko.com%2Fcoins%2Fimages%2F1074%2Flarge%2Fphoenix-logo.png%3F1696502176&w=3840&q=75)
Rank #1398
$0.002285
+0%
Rank #4141
$0.0008180
-17.84%

Rank #4260
$0.004520
-8.99%

Rank #5926
$0.0004930
+0%

Rank #15779
$0.001198
+0%

Rank #18565
$0.0004990
+0%

Rank #19164
$0.09512
+0%
Terra 2.0 which will assume the Terra name is a new blockchain launched by Terraform Labs as part of the passing of governance proposal 1623. The Terra protocol is a decentralized and open-source public blockchain protocol. Luna is the Terra protocol’s native staking token used for governance and mining. Users stake Luna to validators who record and verify transactions on the blockchain in exchange for rewards from transaction fees. The Terra 2.0 chain will not have a stablecoin and holders of the old Terra Classic chain will be airdropped new Luna native coins. In the plan, developers of the Terra ecosystem are to migrate and deploy their dapps on the new blockchain.
27 May 2026, 13:38

🚨 Former Hodlnaut CEO is charged with six counts of fraud over the $189.7 million loss in $UST. Zhu Juntao allegedly misled users and staff during the 2022 TerraUSD crash. 🌐 Critical data: Over 30,000 users worldwide were caught as withdrawals were frozen and the platform shut down. Continue Reading: Former Hodlnaut CEO faces 6 fraud charges after $189.7M UST crash The post Former Hodlnaut CEO faces 6 fraud charges after $189.7M UST crash appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
26 May 2026, 15:56

The government of Singapore has indicted the former CEO of the popular crypto exchange, Hodlnaut, on six charges of fraud. This is due to false representation resulting from the company’s collapse during the market volatility of 2022. The UST collapse in early May 2022 led to losses across the crypto sector. Hodlnaut was not left out. The company invested $317 million from its user accounts in the Anchor Protocol on Terra without disclosing these details to customers, and when UST went down, they suffered losses of $189.7 million. Hodlnaut’s collapse and the CEO’s hand in it Hodlnaut was founded in April 2019 as an online platform that enabled people globally to deposit their Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins holdings in return for interest payments. Simon Lee and Zhu Juntao served as the co-founders of Hodlnaut. In this regard, Zhu Juntao, a 36-year-old Singaporean, studied at Singapore Management University and had experience working at Credit Suisse. Under his management, Hodlnaut grew into a company handling over 30,000 clients, yielding up to 10% annual percentage yield (APY), and managing investments worth approximately $750 million. After Terra’s collapse, Hodlnaut suspended customer withdrawal requests in June 2022 and eventually entered judicial management. When the platform was shut down in August 2022, the company had an estimated $281 million owed to its users, while its assets totaled $88 million, resulting in a deficit of roughly $193 million. As a simple yield generator in the emerging world of decentralized finance, Hodlnaut attracted investors who wanted to earn from crypto without the complicated processes involved in transactions. Mismanaged PR and false promises to customers The prosecution claims that Zhu Juntao instructed his employees to make false promises during and after the UST’s collapse. From May until July 2022, Zhu allegedly incited his employee named Goh Chang Teck, to make false promises in the official Hodlnaut Telegram chat group. In one such case, made before May 25, 2022, he allegedly made a false promise that there was no direct involvement of the company in LUNA or UST and that none of the company’s funds were invested in these assets. Zhu is also claimed to have instructed Megan Lois Lau Shi May, an employee, to send an email to approximately 30 users in 2022. The email stated that Hodlnaut had not incurred any losses as a firm, even though users trading UST on the platform had suffered those losses. Furthermore, Zhu himself posted three times in June 2022 on his personal X account (formerly Twitter). Some of these included: “Hodlnaut as a firm did not take any losses on UST, users who held/bought UST on our platform did,” “Missed this but had no price exposure to $UST or incurred any losses from the debacle,” and others. Charges lay in wait, court appearances, and maximum prison penalties Zhu appeared in court on May 26, 2026, when he was officially charged with committing six counts of fraud by false representation under Section 424A(1)(a) read with Section 424A(3) of the Penal Code 1871. There were three additional counts under Section 109 related to abetment. He pleaded not guilty and contested all the accusations. A pre-trial hearing was set for June 2026. If found guilty of any of the counts, Zhu is liable to serve up to 20 years in prison, pay a fine, or both. The Singapore police have used the case to issue general warnings to the public about investing in digital assets, given their extreme volatility and other factors. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .
26 May 2026, 11:39

The burn address on the Bitcoin network just destroyed 107 BTC forever. The address received five transactions, causing analysts to seek the reason behind destroying the coins. On-chain analysts intercepted a curious Bitcoin transaction . In a series of transfers, an unknown user deposited a total of 107 BTC to the most widely known Bitcoin burn address. Cypher researcher and BTC Blockstream founder Adam Back suggested the burn address is now a potential quantum computing bounty. accidental quantum bounty? — Adam Back (@adam3us) May 26, 2026 The burn address has already received a total of 807 BTC, sent over the years for various reasons. Usually, the address receives small amounts of BTC as a way to create on-chain records. The burn recalls a case in early 2025 when a user burned 500 ETH to send a permanent message on the blockchain. Why is BTC being destroyed? The destruction of 107 BTC slightly increased the amount of coins beyond reach. In this case, the transfer was deliberate. The only thing that united the burn transactions from five different wallets was a timelock. The transactions were automated with a locktime parameter, waiting for block 950,958 . The sender overpaid two times the usual transaction fee to make sure the transfers would be automated and included in the block. The transaction happened just as BTC recovered above $77,500. The leading coin was not showing signs of capitulation, as most whales held onto their reserves. Some of the transfers came from Stacks.co , which used the BTC burns to secure its own chain. The address has been around since 2015, and was known to Bitcointalk forum members. The burn address was especially created so that its public key is all zeroes. The calculation to go from the public to the private key would be intractable, even extremely difficult for hypothetical quantum computing . The address was of interest in the early days of BTC. In general, BTC has a holding ethos, but no known practice of burning coins to diminish the supply. BTC burned by old whale wallet The transactions to the burn address originated from a wallet that started accumulating BTC in 2014. The wallet’s balance peaked at $2.5M at the end of 2025. The entire balance was then sent to the burn address on May 25. Another connected address was also first created before 2015 . The other wallet engaged in the burn received coins from Poloniex and Bitfinex, a usual step for early BTC adopters. The last address used sent some of the BTC to Kraken for trading a year ago. The usage of several addresses and the synchronized transaction to the burn destination suggests a single entity may have decided to destroy 107 BTC. On-chain researchers had no answer for the transfers, which looked deliberate. Each of the involved addresses sent the full BTC balance, previously held for years. The transfers looked like a form of capitulation, which did not even sell the BTC for profit. The burn looks like a previous move by a whale that bought 27 BTC and sent them to one of the inactive addresses of Satoshi Nakamoto. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .
26 May 2026, 11:18

Zhu Juntao, co-founder and former Chief Executive Officer of the now-defunct Singapore-based crypto lending platform Hodlnaut, was charged in a Singapore court on May 26, 2026 with fraud by false representation — nearly four years after the Terra/LUNA ecosystem implosion triggered a $193 million financial shortfall that ultimately ended the platform and stranded more than 30,000 users worldwide. The charges were announced by the Commercial Affairs Department of the Singapore Police Force, which has been investigating Hodlnaut and its directors since November 2022. Zhu, 36, faces six counts in total — three under Section 424A(1)(a) read with Section 424A(3) of Singapore’s Penal Code 1871, and three under the same provision read together with Section 109 of the same code, which covers abetment. If convicted on each charge, he faces imprisonment of up to 20 years, a fine, or both, per the police statement. What The Charges Allege The fraud charges center on a specific window: May to July 2022, the weeks immediately following TerraUSD’s catastrophic de-pegging in early May of that year. According to the Singapore Police Force’s official statement, Zhu allegedly directed Hodlnaut employees to make misleading statements on the company’s official Telegram group and in emails sent directly to users — assertions that Hodlnaut had no direct exposure to UST and had not suffered losses from the collapse. The statements, as documented in Mothership SG’s reporting of court filings, included a post in which Hodlnaut wrote that it had “not taken any losses as a firm” and that only users who personally held UST were affected. Zhu also allegedly directed a separate employee to email 30 recipients stating the company had assumed no losses. Those statements, prosecutors now allege, were false and intended to deceive users during the most critical period of the platform’s deterioration. What Actually Happened With Terra The judicial record that emerged after Hodlnaut suspended withdrawals in August 2022 told a starkly different story. An interim judicial managers’ report seen by Bloomberg found that Hodlnaut had lost nearly $190 million through its exposure to the collapsed Terra ecosystem — a figure the platform had actively downplayed to users while the losses accumulated. On-chain analytics firms subsequently confirmed material exposure to UST and TerraForm Labs-linked activity that Hodlnaut had not previously acknowledged. Court documents filed in Singapore in August 2022, when the platform sought creditor protection, disclosed a $193 million financial shortfall. Court-appointed managers later confirmed an additional $13.1 million in user assets were stranded on the collapsed FTX exchange. Hodlnaut was subsequently ordered to liquidate by Singapore’s High Court, with EY partners appointed as joint liquidators. Zhu indicated he was not guilty and disputed all charges at his May 26 hearing — a pre-trial conference has been scheduled for June 2026, per Channel News Asia. This development marks a significant moment for the nascent sector’s long-running accountability reckoning following the 2022 crypto contagion. The Terra collapse set off a chain of platform failures — Celsius, Voyager, Three Arrows Capital, and eventually FTX among them — that collectively cost retail users hundreds of billions of dollars. That four years have elapsed between Hodlnaut’s collapse and its former CEO’s first day in court is itself a reflection of how slowly the legal system processes crypto’s most consequential failures — and a reminder that the cases are far from closed. Cover image from Grok, ETHUSD chart from Tradingview